Islamic Calligraphy

ULTIMATE SYMMETRY:

Fractal Complex-Time and Quantum Gravity

by Mohamed Haj Yousef



Search Inside this Book


IV.1.1 Pantheism and Panentheism


According to what we have introduced above, the Oneness of Being is often confused with Pantheism or Panentheism, the first means that the universe, conceived of as a whole, is identical with God, while the other asserts that God includes the universe as a part though not the whole of His Being. Both of these doctrines stress the all-embracing inclusiveness of God, as compared with His separateness emphasized in many traditional theistic doctrines.

Pantheism was popularized in Western culture as a theology and philosophy based on the work of Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677), particularly his book: Ethics, but the term itself was coined two decades later. Although the terms are recent, Pantheism and Panentheism have been applied retrospectively to some ancient philosophical traditions. Einstein is regarded as pantheist, where he explicitly wrote: We followers of Spinoza see our God in the wonderful order and lawfulness of all that exists and in its soul as it reveals itself in man and animal. [18, p. 51].

Some scholars and critics of the Oneness of Being wrongly consider Ibn al-Arabi as pantheist, observing the obvious connections and similarities between many of the ideas and concepts that Spinoza developed in his Ethics and that of Ibn al-Arabi s. For both Ibn al-Arabi and Spinoza there is no ultimate existence to anything other than God [32, Prop. xiv. xv.], and they both believe the immanence of God and that He is not outside or separate from the Universe, but many pantheists then went on to imagine God as non-anthropomorphic and non-personal or non-personified being and that he has no will and no ability or power over the world.

Therefore, in spite of captivating most of their philosophical conceptions from the Oneness of Being, both Pantheism and Panentheism overlooked the core aspects of God, namely the four fundamental Attributes: Living, Knowing, Ability and Will; that are necessary and sufficient for Godship. Only with these four fundamental Attributes, from which many other Attributes also follow, as we shall discuss further in section IV.1.3, the doctrine may become coherent and comprehensive, because half knowledge is double ignorance. No proper doctrine could possibly be held true without taking into account all these divine Attributes, which then require the acceptance of divine Omnipotence, Supremacy and Influence, and basically all other theological descriptions introduced by the main religions, including the believe in messengers and their authentic divine messages in general.

Moreover, in addition to its uncompromising adherence to the absolute Oneness and Transcendence of God, no matter how much it considers the creations to be intimately interrelated to Him, the most obvious distinguishing feature of the Oneness of Being is its dualistic view of the creation. Created entities have various categorized forms of existence, ranging from the outward physical complexion, confined in the geometrical dimensions of space and time, to the highest spiritual presences that may be transcendent and even eternal, but on top of all that, there is always the innermost divine aspect that cannot be differentiated from God. When we look at their outward forms of existence, the creations are obviously not God, and not even real, but if we consider their innermost level, of being, they are not other than God. In Ibn al-Arabi s own words, the things are: He/not He [Futuhat: II.168.23, II.343.28, II.379.9, II.444.16, II.501.4, III.343.23, III.471.13] or : they are not Him, and they are not other than Him [Futuhat: I.42.21, I.204.12, I.284.32, I.680.7, III.275.32, IV.46.6, IV.129.31, IV.228.12, IV.236.15]. For if we say the things are God, this means confining Him in objects and dimensions, and yet if we say that they are not Him, then this implies the assertion of other separate and self-subsistent existents. Therefore, the forms do not have any real independent existence, but they exist by and through God, not by themselves. For Ibn al-Arabi, this is the secret of sincerity , which is also the secret of destiny that makes clear the fundamental distinction between the Creator and the creation, the Eternal and the created. He explains that this secret has been hidden from most people [Futuhat: III.182.11].

In general, Pantheism and Panentheism can be explored in comparison with traditional theistic views according to their various standpoints regarding immanence or transcendence, monism, dualism, or pluralism, or also regarding the relation to time and eternity, or weather the world is sentient, real or illusory, in addition to other issues such as freedom, determinism and secularism.

Generally, classical theism holds to the transcendence of God, but also His existence over and beyond the Universe, while also recognizing that if the separation between God and the world becomes too extreme, humanity risks the loss of communication with Him. Panentheism, however, maintains that the divine can be both transcendent and immanent at the same time, while Pantheism holds only to the divine immanence, and it is typically monistic, with some intuition of personal union with God. Panentheism is monistic in holding to the unity of God and the world, but dualistic in urging the separateness of God s essence from the world, and pluralistic in taking seriously the multiplicity of the kinds of beings and events making up the world. On the other hand, most forms of Pantheism understand the eternal God to be in intimate juxtaposition with the world, thus minimizing time or making it illusory. In Panentheism, the temporality of the world is not canceled out, and time retains its reality.

For both pantheism and classical theism, God is absolute; and for many forms of pantheism, the world, since it is identical with God, is likewise absolute, unlike classical theism, which envisages a separation between God and the world, thus considering God is absolute but the world relative. For Panentheism, however, God can be absolute and relative, cause and effect, actual and potential, active and passive, according to the different levels of the divine nature; both extremes can be attributed to God without inconsistency. Pantheism also rejects the idea of a personal entity of God and that He is transcendent, and since He doe not have a will He cannot act in or upon the universe.

In recent centuries, pantheism became the viewpoint of many leading writers and philosophers, such as William Wordsworth and Samuel Coleridge in Britain; Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Schelling and Hegel in Germany; Knut Hamsun in Norway; and Walt Whitman, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau in the United States. In 1864, it was formally condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors.

 



  previous page

contents

next page  

Read Other Books:

Single Monad Model of the Cosmos
The Single Monad Model of the Cosmos: Ibn Arabi's View of Time and Creation
The Duality of Time Theory
The Duality of Time Theory: Complex-Time Geometry and Perpertual Creation of Space
The Duality of Time Theory
The Ultimate Symmetry: Fractal Complex-Time and Quantum Gravity
The Chest of Time
The Chest of Time: Particle-Wave Duality: from Time Confinement to Space Transcendence

Read this short concise exploration of the Duality of Time Postulate:

he Duality of Time Postulate
DoT: The Duality of Time Postulate and Its Consequences on General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

Other Pages Related to Search Keywords:

  • ... Monadology =>:

  • ... Space Transcendence Read this short concise exploration of the Duality of Time Postulate: DoT: The Duality of Time Postulate and Its Consequences on General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics ...


  • ... Geometrical Dimensions =>:

  • ... re of the Oneness of Being is its dualistic view of the creation. Created entities have various categorized forms of existence, ranging from the outward physical complexion, confined in the GEOMETRICAL DIMENSIONS of space and time, to the highest spiritual presences that may be transcenden ...


  • ... Divine Att =>:

  • ... IV.1.3, the doctrine may become coherent and comprehensive, because half knowledge is double ignorance. No proper doctrine could possibly be held true without taking into account all these divine Attributes, which then require the acceptance of divine Omnipotence, Supremacy and Influence, ...


  • ... Divine Attribute =>:

  • ... IV.1.3, the doctrine may become coherent and comprehensive, because half knowledge is double ignorance. No proper doctrine could possibly be held true without taking into account all these divine Attributes, which then require the acceptance of divine Omnipotence, Supremacy and Influence, ...


  • ... Absolute O =>:

  • ... scriptions introduced by the main religions, including the believe in messengers and their authentic divine messages in general. Moreover, in addition to its uncompromising adherence to the absolute Oneness and Transcendence of God, no matter how much it considers the creations to be intim ...


  • ... Divine Attributes =>:

  • ... IV.1.3, the doctrine may become coherent and comprehensive, because half knowledge is double ignorance. No proper doctrine could possibly be held true without taking into account all these divine Attributes, which then require the acceptance of divine Omnipotence, Supremacy and Influence, ...


  • ... Absolute Oneness =>:

  • ... scriptions introduced by the main religions, including the believe in messengers and their authentic divine messages in general. Moreover, in addition to its uncompromising adherence to the absolute Oneness and Transcendence of God, no matter how much it considers the creations to be intim ...


  • ... Distinguishing Feature =>:

  • ... dition to its uncompromising adherence to the absolute Oneness and Transcendence of God, no matter how much it considers the creations to be intimately interrelated to Him, the most obvious DISTINGUISHING FEATURE of the Oneness of Being is its dualistic view of the creation. Created entiti ...


  • ... Ancient Philosophical =>:

  • ... 32-1677), particularly his book: Ethics, but the term itself was coined two decades later. Although the terms are recent, Pantheism and Panentheism have been applied retrospectively to some ANCIENT PHILOSOPHICAL traditions. Einstein is regarded as pantheist, where he explicitly wrote: We f ...


  • ... Highest Spiritual =>:

  • ... of the creation. Created entities have various categorized forms of existence, ranging from the outward physical complexion, confined in the geometrical dimensions of space and time, to the HIGHEST SPIRITUAL presences that may be transcendent and even eternal, but on top of all that, there ...


  • ... Outward Forms =>:

  • ... ritual presences that may be transcendent and even eternal, but on top of all that, there is always the innermost divine aspect that cannot be differentiated from God. When we look at their OUTWARD FORMS of existence, the creations are obviously not God, and not even real, but if we consid ...


  • ... Yousef Search =>:

  • ... Time Postulate: DoT: The Duality of Time Postulate and Its Consequences on General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics ...


Welcome to the Single Monad Model of the Cosmos and Duality of Time Theory
Forgot Password? - [Register]

Message from the Author:

I have no doubt that this is the most significant discovery in the history of mathematics, physics and philosophy, ever!

By revealing the mystery of the connection between discreteness and contintuity, this novel understanding of the complex (time-time) geometry, will cause a paradigm shift in our knowledge of the fundamental nature of the cosmos and its corporeal and incorporeal structures.

Enjoy reading...

Mohamed Haj Yousef


Check this detailed video presentation on "Deriving the Principles of Special, General and Quantum Relativity Based on the Single Monad Model Cosmos and Duality of Time Theory".

Download the Book "DOT: The Duality of Time Postulate and Its Consequences on General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics" or: READ ONLINE .....>>>>



Subsribe to Newsletter:


Because He loves beauty, Allah invented the World with ultimate perfection, and since He is the All-Beautiful, He loved none but His own Essence. But He also liked to see Himself reflected outwardly, so He created (the entities of) the World according to the form of His own Beauty, and He looked at them, and He loved these confined forms. Hence, the Magnificent made the absolute beauty --routing in the whole World-- projected into confined beautiful patterns that may diverge in their relative degrees of brilliance and grace.
paraphrased from: Ibn al-Arabi [The Meccan Revelations: IV.269.18 - trans. Mohamed Haj Yousef]
quote